ClassPad 300, la calculatrice avec buzzer piézo de Casio ! 1389 (23/01 15:25).Injection d'un jeu Snake via ROP hackstring sur fx-991CN X 936 (25/01 07:53).When decisions are too extreme and thus unfair, people don't respect them and find workarounds to do things by themselves.įor whatever reason it is, we'll have to deal with the consequences and with this new Boot1.5-based boot loader, whatever is hidden inside its code, and release tutorials for it. A very bad decision in the later case, things could have been much different. You may fear that he'll include some CAS related code in his own boot loader, yes, although there were none in nBoot+ControlX and Nlaunch CXM 2.5 (the latest Nlaunch* update).īut the situation is not his fault, it's just a consequence of the higher security in Boot1 4.0, or of a decision to stop releasing Boot1 flaws (nothing since october 2015 - strangely more than 2 years now). If a Boot1 4.0 flaw had been exploited, be sure that I would have updated ControlX and that it would have been *perfectly* clean. He is developping both (although as I mentionned he never updated the CAS patchers for 4.5) because nobody leaked a Boot1 4.0 flaw. so bye-bye everyone until this week-end, probably) ![]() ![]() Now he, TI-Planet, and the community as a whole, are stained with this filth.Īnyway, I only "wanted" to post one message, now that I've written twice that, I'll stop (Plus, I have to pack some things, I'll be gone for a few days, for work, probably without much access to the internet freely. The CAS-OS-on-nonCAS-devices patches should never have existed. Here, the fact that parrotgeek is the developer of both this launcher and the CAS patches (no matter the versions, even though he did say multiple times he will update it) is making the situation even worse. Even parrotgeek said it in his first post of the topic, "people will not need such ndless programs soon" (paraphrasing). The launcher itself, I may not disagree with at 100%, but one has to really be blind (simply refuse to see the truth) to see that 99.99% of its usage is going to be for cheating. ![]() Yes, with PTT and the new Ndless versions, the risk to have people succeed in cheating by having CAS when they shouldn't, for instance, is lower, which is good Hard to agree to promote cheating and risking toxic behaviour for the community to have negative consequences for all of us. Primarily because they (contrary to KhiCAS or nEigenmath) directly and actively bypass protections on systems in order to run and perform forbidden actions (under exams circumstances, for instance). are one of the things I don't agree with. ![]() I don't disagree with many things hacking-related in the calculator community, as many of us are "bidouilleurs" (me included), but for instance PTT-killers (and related), CAS-OS-on-nonCAS-devices patchers/launchers/etc. I simply wrote these few lines because I was advised tooįor me, as long as a CAS OS can run on a non-CAS device, the (moral) matter will never be solved in the community.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |